Volume 20, Issue 2 (10-2023)                   J Res Dev Nurs Midw 2023, 20(2): 9-13 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Aydemir A, Esenkaya D. Frequency of urinary incontinence in women, risk factors, and effect of incontinence on quality of life: A cross-sectional study on the Turkish population. J Res Dev Nurs Midw 2023; 20 (2) :9-13
URL: http://nmj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1571-en.html
1- Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Giresun University, Giresun, Türkiye , azizeaydemir@hotmail.com
2- Nursing, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Türkiye
Abstract:   (373 Views)
Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a prevalent health issue that has a psychological impact on those affected. Urinary incontinence, which affects approximately 1 in every 3 women, is a distressing condition that significantly impairs their quality of life (QOL). This study aimed to investigate the frequency of UI in women, identify risk factors, and assess its impact on the QOL.
Methods: This analytical, cross-sectional study involved 300 women aged 20 and above who were admitted to the Obstetrics Clinic of a university hospital between June 21, 2022, and August 15, 2022. Data were collected through a questionnaire that included the Descriptive Characteristics Form, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), and Wagner QOL Scale. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, and results were evaluated with a 95% CI. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results: The frequency of UI among the participants was 48% according to the ICIQ-SF and 62% according to the Wagner QOL Scale. Participants reported experiencing mild UI and psychological distress. The psychosocial well-being of women with UI was found to be moderately and negatively affected (48%). It was determined that 52.2% of the variation in the UI variable could be explained by factors such as body mass index (BMI), history of miscarriage, education level, and age. Miscarriage (Odds ratio [OR], 3.102; 95% CI, 1.502-6.408), lower education level (OR, 3.211; 95% CI, 1.282-8.408), and age (OR, 1.061; 95% CI, 1.024-1.100) were identified as risk factors for UI (P < 0.05). A significant correlation (r = 0.89; P < 0.001) was observed between the QOL and ICIQ-SF measurement tools.
Conclusion: Nearly half of the women experience UI, which has a detrimental impact on their QOL. Higher education levels, healthy lifestyle, and post-miscarriage risk assessment can help protect women from UI.
Full-Text [PDF 447 kb]   (200 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (22 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Midwifery

References
1. Whiting D, Shane AI, Pope R, Payne S, Venn S. Female urinary incontinence in sub‐Saharan Africa. BJU Int. 2022;130(5):543-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
2. Hagen S, Elders A, Stratton S, Sergenson N, Bugge C, Dean S. et al. Effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training with and without electromyographic biofeedback for urinary incontinence in women: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2020;371. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Akkus Y, Pinar G. Evaluation of the prevalence, type, severity, and risk factors of urinary incontinence and its impact on quality of life among women in Turkey. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(6):887-93. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
4. Şimşek Ş, Yağcı N. Investigation of urinary incontinence prevalance and pelvic floor dysfunction awareness in healthcare professionals. Journal of Adnan Menderes University Health Sciences Faculty. 2022;6(1):77-84. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
5. Daneshpajooh A, Naghibzadeh‐Tahami A, Najafipour H, Mirzaei M. Prevalence and risk factors of urinary incontinence among Iranian women. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 2021;40(2):642-52. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
6. Luo R, Dai W, Tay LH, Ng FC, Koh LT. Urinary incontinence in female outpatients in Singapore. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(4):579-84. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
7. Çetinel B, Özkan B, Can G, Oscan B. The validation study of ICIQ-SF Turkish version. Turk J Urol. 2004;30:332-8. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
8. Wagner TH, Patrick DL, Bavendam TG, Martin ML, Buesching DP. Quality of life of persons with urinary incontinence: development of a new measure. Urology. 1996;47(1):67-71. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
9. Karan A, Aksaç B, Ayyıldız H, Işıkoğlu M, Yalçın O, Eskiyurt N. Quality of life and its relation with objective assessment parameters in urinary incontinent patients. Turkish J Geriatr. 2000;3(3):102-6. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
10. Yılmaz E, Muslu A, Özcan E. Quality of life at women with urinary inkontinence. ERÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 2014;2(2):1-14. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
11. Durukan H, Tok E, Tok D, Aytan H. Self-Perceived frequency of urinary incontinence by women and distribution of incontinence types according to age-groups in target population of Mersin. Medical Bulletin of Zeynep Kamil. 2015;46(1):1-5. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
12. Xie X, Chen Y, Khan A, Long T, Li S, Xie M. Risk factors for urinary incontinence in Chinese women: a cross-sectional survey. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021;27(6):377-81. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
13. Rodríguez-López ES, Calvo-Moreno SO, Basas-García Á, Gut- ierrez-Ortega F, Guodemar-Pérez J, Acevedo-Gómez MB. Prevalence of urinary incontinence among elite athletes of both sexes. J Sci Med Sport. 2021;24(4):338-44. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
14. Maroyi R, Mwambali N, Moureau MK, Keyser LE, McKinney JL, Brown HW, et al. Prevalence of urinary incontinence in pregnant and postpartum women in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(7):1883-8. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
15. Treister-Goltzman Y, Peleg R. Urinary incontinence among Muslim women in Israel: risk factors and help-seeking behavior. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(4):539-46. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
16. Daneshpajooh A, Naghibzadeh‐Tahami A, Najafipour H, Mirzaei M. Prevalence and risk factors of urinary incontinence among Iranian women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021;40(2):642-52. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
17. Mutungi T, Spitzer R, Origa M, Kayondo M, Kyakuhaire M, Nyiramugisha J. Prevalence of urogynaecology symptoms in a rural population in western-Uganda. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(5):727. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
18. Demir Ö, Sen V, Irer B, Bozkurt O, Esen A. Prevalence and possible risk factors for urinary incontinence: A cohort study in the city of Izmir. Urol Int. 2017;99(1):84-90. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
19. Yağmur Y, Gül S. Urinary incontinence in women aged 40 and older: Its prevalence, risk factors, and effect on quality of life. Niger J Clin Pract. 2021;24(2):186-92. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research Development in Nursing and Midwifery

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb