Volume 20, Issue 2 (10-2023)
J Res Dev Nurs Midw 2023, 20(2): 23-25 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mousavi M, Rezaei M, Malekzadeh M, Rastian M, Dehbanizadeh A. The effect of the SOAPIE nursing notes method on the quality of nursing documentation. J Res Dev Nurs Midw 2023; 20 (2) :23-25
URL: http://nmj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1499-en.html
URL: http://nmj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1499-en.html
MohammadSajjad Mousavi1 
, Malihe Rezaei1 , Mohammad Malekzadeh2 , Mohammadlatif Rastian 3, Abolfazl Dehbanizadeh1
, Malihe Rezaei1 , Mohammad Malekzadeh2 , Mohammadlatif Rastian 3, Abolfazl Dehbanizadeh1
1- School of Nursing, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
2- Health Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
3- School of Nursing, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran , r115_rastian@yahoo.com
2- Health Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
3- School of Nursing, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran , r115_rastian@yahoo.com
Abstract: (424 Views)
Background: Nursing notes are among the most critical tasks for nurses, and not performing it in a correct manner will lead nurses to face numerous issues and problems. Nursing notes can be written in a variety of ways. One approach is the nursing process-based SOAPIE (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan, Intervention, Evaluation) method. Thus, the present research was conducted to determine of the SOAPIE Nursing note Method on the quality of Nursing Documentation.
Methods: The present semi-experimental study was conducted in 2021 at Yasuj hospitals, in Iran. The samples consisted of 120 nurses selected through the convenience sampling method based on the inclusion criteria. The samples were assigned to two intervention and control groups through a random allocation method. Nursing notes using the SOAPIE method was implemented for 3 weeks in the intervention group after obtaining informed consent. The data were collected using the checklist of nursing documentation principles, which involved two sections of demographic information and nursing documentation-related items before the intervention and one month after the intervention. The mean score of each of the eleven principles was determined from the total score of 100. Three levels were considered in the tool’s scoring: Poor (0-33), moderate (34-66), and favorable (67-100). The descriptive and inferential statistics methods (the chi-square test, independent t-test, and paired t-test) and SPSS software version 21 were used for data analysis.
Results: The total score of quality of nursing documentation had no statistically significant difference in the intervention and control groups before the intervention (P<0.05). However, one month after the intervention, the total score of the quality of nursing documentation showed a statistically significant difference between the intervention and control groups (P=0.001). Before the intervention, the mean total scores of the quality of nursing documentation were 46.66±14.45 and 48.22±12.45 between the two intervention and control groups, respectively, and one month after the intervention, they were 91.53±5.98 and 48.52±12.61, respectively.
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, nursing notes using the SOAPIE method lead to promoting the quality of nursing documentation. Nursing documentation based on the high quality of nursing notes should always be taken into account. It is suggested that the findings of this study be employed for educational and research planning in nursing.
Methods: The present semi-experimental study was conducted in 2021 at Yasuj hospitals, in Iran. The samples consisted of 120 nurses selected through the convenience sampling method based on the inclusion criteria. The samples were assigned to two intervention and control groups through a random allocation method. Nursing notes using the SOAPIE method was implemented for 3 weeks in the intervention group after obtaining informed consent. The data were collected using the checklist of nursing documentation principles, which involved two sections of demographic information and nursing documentation-related items before the intervention and one month after the intervention. The mean score of each of the eleven principles was determined from the total score of 100. Three levels were considered in the tool’s scoring: Poor (0-33), moderate (34-66), and favorable (67-100). The descriptive and inferential statistics methods (the chi-square test, independent t-test, and paired t-test) and SPSS software version 21 were used for data analysis.
Results: The total score of quality of nursing documentation had no statistically significant difference in the intervention and control groups before the intervention (P<0.05). However, one month after the intervention, the total score of the quality of nursing documentation showed a statistically significant difference between the intervention and control groups (P=0.001). Before the intervention, the mean total scores of the quality of nursing documentation were 46.66±14.45 and 48.22±12.45 between the two intervention and control groups, respectively, and one month after the intervention, they were 91.53±5.98 and 48.52±12.61, respectively.
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, nursing notes using the SOAPIE method lead to promoting the quality of nursing documentation. Nursing documentation based on the high quality of nursing notes should always be taken into account. It is suggested that the findings of this study be employed for educational and research planning in nursing.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Nursing
References
1. Rahbar A, Seyedi Andi SJ, Darkhor S, Ahmadzadeh TN, Yosefi Roshan H, Gholinia H. Audit of nursing documentation reports in intensive and general wards of medical education center of shahid yahyanezhad. Novin Health Journal. 2018;3(1):24-9. [View at Publisher]
2. Griffith R. What to include in a nursing record. Br J Nurs. 2016;25(9):520-1. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Linch GFdC, Lima AAA, Souza ENd, Nauderer TM, Paz AA , da Costa C. An educational intervention impact on the quality of nursing records. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2017;25:e2938. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
4. Jung D , Kim JH. Effects of a sexual health care nursing record on the attitudes and practice of oncology nurses. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2016;9:21-6. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
5. Turkamannezhad Sabzevari M, Khosrojerdi M , Azizi F. Comparison the Effect of Nursing Record Educatoin Based on Critical Thinking with Routine Educatoin on Nurses and Midwives Record Skills in Sabzevar Mobini Hospital. J Sabzevar Univ Med Sci. 2021;28(3):425-30.[In Persian] [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
6. Zabolypour S, Mohammadi S, Fararooei M, Hosseini M , Bazgirian M. A Review of Quality of Nursing Documentation in Different Fields and the Lack of Proper Reporting by Nurses in Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Yasouj. Iranian Journal of Nursing Research. 2017;12(2):38-44.[In Persian] [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
7. Almasi S, Cheraghi F, Dehghani M, Ehsani S, Khalili A , Alimohammadi N. Effects of Problem, Intervention, Evaluation (PIE) Training on the Quality of Nursing Documentation Among Students of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2018;15(1):e65204. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
8. Glasper A. Strategies to ensure that all patients have a personalised nursing care plan. Br J Nurs. 2020;29(1):62-3. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] []
9. Asencios KLC. Relación del nivel de conocimiento y práctica del Modelo SOAPIE en la Calidad de las anotaciones de los profesionales de Enfermería del Hospital II EsSalud, Vitarte. Revista Científica de Ciencias de la Salud. 2012;5(1):15-21. [In Spanish] [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
10. Nomura ATG, Pruinelli L, Da Silva MB, de Fátima Lucena A , de Abreu Almeida M. Quality of electronic nursing records: the impact of educational interventions during a hospital accreditation process. Comput Inform Nurs. 2018;36(3):127-32. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
11. Edith SC, Carhuanca T, Rebeca VFT, Román A , Celina MCJ. Relationship between knowledge level model soapie (nursing process) and quality of nursing records in the ICU of the Regional Teaching Hospital Maternal and Child" El Carmen Huancayo 2013. Enero-Junio. 2017;2(1):25-32.[In Spanish] [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
12. Azarkish V, Mirzaee MS, Malekzadeh M, Mousavi A, Rastian ML. Comparison of the effect of teaching professional ethics code using the two methods of flipped classroom and short message service on the moral sensitivity of nursing students. J Res Dev Nurs Midw. 2023;20(1):31-4. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
13. Hemmati Maslakpak M, Khajeali N , Kazemi N. The impact of problem-oriented reporting education on characteristics of nursing report. Iran Journal of Nursing. 2013;26(85):26-34. [In Persian] [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
14. Farzi S , Farzi S, Moladoost A. Quality of nursing records and its relationship with some demographic characteristics of nurses working in intensive care units. Iranian Journal of Nursing Research. 2016;11(2):24-31. [In Persian] [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
15. Dutra HS, Mendes SE, Carneiro SM, da Costa FM, Barboza RdCP , Ribeiro LC. Nursing records at a teaching hospital: a quasi-experimental study. Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing. 2016;15(3):351-60. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
16. Oliveira NBD, Peres HHC. Quality of the documentation of the Nursing process in clinical decision support systems. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2021;29:e3426. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
17. Briscoe J, Harding T. Promoting the use of the soap (IE) documentation framework in medical nurses' practice. Kaitiaki Nursing Research. 2020;11(1):17-23. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
18. Ramón VLP, Amores FBC. Use of SOAPIER format in rotating interns of the Nursing career. Int J Interdiscip Multidiscip Stud. 2023;4(1). [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
19. Sapkota B, Shrestha R, Giri S. Community pharmacy-based SOAP notes documentation. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(30):e29495. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
20. Moldskred PS, Snibsøer AK, Espehaug B. Improving the quality of nursing documentation at a residential care home: a clinical audit. BMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):1-7. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
21. Adereti CS, Olaogun AA. Use of electronic and paper‐based standardized nursing care plans to improve nurses' documentation quality in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Int J Nurs knowl. 2019;30(4):219-27. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
22. Akhu‐Zaheya L, Al‐Maaitah R, Bany Hani S. Quality of nursing documentation: Paper‐based health records versus electronic‐based health records. J Clin Nur. 2018;27(3-4):e578-89. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
23. Sayyah-Melli M, Mofrad MN, Amini A, Piri Z, Ghojazadeh M , Rahmani V. The Effect of medical recording training on quantity and quality of recording in gynecology residents of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. J Caring Sci. 2017;6(3):281-92. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
