Volume 21, Issue 4 (12-2024)
J Res Dev Nurs Midw 2024, 21(4): 14-18 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nakhaee N, Amiri F, Samari M, Sharifi H, Iranpour A. Fertility intention and its sociodemographic correlations among female marriage volunteers: A province-wide cross-sectional survey in Iran. J Res Dev Nurs Midw 2024; 21 (4) :14-18
URL: http://nmj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1844-en.html
URL: http://nmj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1844-en.html
1- Health Services Management Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
2- Reproductive Health, Family and Population Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
3- HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran; Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
4- HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran ,Iranpourabedin89@gmail.com
2- Reproductive Health, Family and Population Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
3- HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran; Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
4- HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran ,
Abstract: (396 Views)
Background: Declining fertility rates pose significant demographic challenges globally, particularly in Europe, the Asia-Pacific region, and Iran. Female marriage volunteers, as a group capable of having children, are a key target for pronatalist policies. We aimed to identify the factors influencing fertility intention among Iranian female marriage volunteers.
Methods: We conducted a province-wide cross-sectional survey from January to April 2023. Using a convenience sampling approach and a validated questionnaire (Determinants of Childbearing Intention Questionnaire), we assessed the childbearing intention (i.e., intention to have a child during the next three years) and fertility intention (i.e., ideal number of kids) among 1,506 female marriage volunteers in Kerman, Iran. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews and the sealed ballot box method was applied to ensure the confidentiality of the participants’ information. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the factors associated with childbearing and fertility intentions.
Results: The majority of the female marriage volunteers (83.7%) intended to have two or more children, and 61.8% of them intended to have a child during the next three years. They believed that the most appropriate time to have a child after marriage was 2.2 (±1.8) years. Physical and mental health, with a mean of 4.37 (0.94) out of a possible score range of 0 to 5, was the most important perceived barrier to having children. The participants stated that the most appropriate ages for women and men to marry were 22.1 (3.7) and 26.2 (3.9) years, respectively. The vertical collectivism score was 3.90 (0.85) out of the maximum attainable score of 5. The working or educational situation of premarital women was a barrier against fertility intention (OR=0.82; CI95%= 0.71-0.94, p<0.001) and childbearing intention (OR=0.81; CI95%= 0.73-0.89, p<0.001).
Conclusion: Despite the decline in the total fertility rate, the tendency to have children is still promising in Iranian female marriage volunteers. Their concern about work and education was the main obstacle to their childbearing intention. This finding underlines the need to implement supportive measures for having children, as seen in the law.
Methods: We conducted a province-wide cross-sectional survey from January to April 2023. Using a convenience sampling approach and a validated questionnaire (Determinants of Childbearing Intention Questionnaire), we assessed the childbearing intention (i.e., intention to have a child during the next three years) and fertility intention (i.e., ideal number of kids) among 1,506 female marriage volunteers in Kerman, Iran. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews and the sealed ballot box method was applied to ensure the confidentiality of the participants’ information. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the factors associated with childbearing and fertility intentions.
Results: The majority of the female marriage volunteers (83.7%) intended to have two or more children, and 61.8% of them intended to have a child during the next three years. They believed that the most appropriate time to have a child after marriage was 2.2 (±1.8) years. Physical and mental health, with a mean of 4.37 (0.94) out of a possible score range of 0 to 5, was the most important perceived barrier to having children. The participants stated that the most appropriate ages for women and men to marry were 22.1 (3.7) and 26.2 (3.9) years, respectively. The vertical collectivism score was 3.90 (0.85) out of the maximum attainable score of 5. The working or educational situation of premarital women was a barrier against fertility intention (OR=0.82; CI95%= 0.71-0.94, p<0.001) and childbearing intention (OR=0.81; CI95%= 0.73-0.89, p<0.001).
Conclusion: Despite the decline in the total fertility rate, the tendency to have children is still promising in Iranian female marriage volunteers. Their concern about work and education was the main obstacle to their childbearing intention. This finding underlines the need to implement supportive measures for having children, as seen in the law.
Type of study: Original Article |
Subject:
Midwifery
References
1. Ni S. Young People's Fertility Intentions and Concerns Under the Two-Child Policy Context. In From One Child to Two Children: Opportunities and Challenges for the One-child Generation Cohort in China: Springer; 2023. p.131-59 [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
2. Kim T. The impact of working hours on pregnancy intention in childbearing-age women in Korea, the country with the world's lowest fertility rate. PloS one. 2023;18(7):e0288697. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Firouzbakht M, Tirgar A, Hajian-Tilaki K, Ebadi A, Bakouei F, Nikpour M, et al. Social capital and fertility behaviors among female workers in healthcare settings: study protocol of a sequential explanatory mixed methods study. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):67. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
4. Natalia VB, Schumacher AE, Aali A, Abate YH, Abbasgholizadeh R, Abbasian M, et al. Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950-2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024;403(10440):2057-99. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
5. Mehri N, Messkoub M, Kunkel S. Trends, determinants and the implications of population aging in Iran. Aging International. 2020;45(4):327-43. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
6. Fathi E. The phenomenon of population aging in Iran. Iranian Journal of Official Statistics Studies (IJOSS). 2020;30(2):387-413. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
7. Vollset SE, Goren E, Yuan CW, Cao J, Smith AE, Hsiao T, et al. Fertility, mortality, migration, and population scenarios for 195 countries and territories from 2017 to 2100: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1285-306. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
8. Hashemzadeh M, Shariati M, Mohammad Nazari A, Keramat A. Childbearing intention and its associated factors: A systematic review. Nurs Open. 2021;8(5):2354-68. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
9. Pelham B, Hardin C, Murray D, Shimizu M, Vandello J. A truly global, non-WEIRD examination of collectivism: The global collectivism index (GCI). Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. 2022;3:100030. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
10. Bagi M. Reasons for Delayed Marriage and Its Determinants in Iran. Journal of Applied Sociology. 2023;34(1):31-50. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
11. Taghizadeh Z, Behmanesh F, Ebadi A. Marriage patterns and childbearing: results from a quantitative study in north of Iran. Glob J Health Sci
. 2016;8(3):1-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
12. Yazdanpanah M, Eslami M, Nakhaee N. Effectiveness of the premarital education programme in Iran. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2014;2014. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
13. Barati Sedeh Z, Mohammadian Behnami M, Nakhaee N. Couple Relationship Education Through mHealth: A To-Year Follow-Up Quasi-Experimental Study. Am J Fam Ther. 2025;53(1):17-31. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
14. Nakhaee N, Khajeh Z. Development and Validation of the determinants of childbearing intention questionnaire based on theory of planned behavior in Iranian women. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2022;32(211):64-74. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
15. Ghasemi J, Safizadeh M, Khajeh Z, Nakhaee N. Immediate Antecedents of Intentions for Having Children in Southeast Iranian Women. Korean J Fam Med. 2023;44(5):289-94. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
16. Yang H, Han R, Wang Z. Third-child fertility intention and its socioeconomic factors among women aged 20-34 years in China. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):821. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
17. Fatehi K, Priestley JL, Taasoobshirazi G. The expanded view of individualism and collectivism: One, two, or four dimensions? International Journal of Cross Cultural Management. 2020;20(1):7-24. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
18. Lau BH-P, Huo R, Wang K, Shi L, Li R, Mu S, et al. Intention of having a second child among infertile and fertile women attending outpatient gynecology clinics in three major cities in China: a cross-sectional study. Hum Reprod Open. 2018;2018(4):hoy014. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
19. Ajzen I, Klobas J. Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demogr Res. 2013;29:203-32. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
20. Huang S-M, Tseng L-M, Lai JC-Y, Tsai Y-F, Lien P-J, Chen P-H. Impact of symptom and social support on fertility intention in reproductive-age women with breast cancer. Clinical Nursing Research. 2020;29(6):411-8. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
21. Beaujouan E, Berghammer C. The gap between lifetime fertility intentions and completed fertility in Europe and the United States: A cohort approach. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2019;38:507-35. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
22. Yoon SY. The influence of a supportive environment for families on women's fertility intentions and behavior in South Korea. Demogr Res. 2017;36:227-54. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
23. Zeng Y, Hesketh T. The effects of China's universal two-child policy. Lancet. 2016;388(10054):1930-8. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
24. Rahnama A, Roozbeh N, Salimi Asl A, Kazemi Gerashi Z, Abbaszadeh M, Dabiri F. Factors related to childbearing in Iran: A systematic review. J Prevent Med. 2022;9(1):6-17. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
25. Yoon L. Median age at first marriage in South Korea from 1990 to 2023, by gender. 2024. [View at Publisher]
27. Ning N, Tang J, Huang Y, Tan X, Lin Q, Sun M. Fertility intention to have a third child in China following the three-child policy: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(22):15412. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
28. Boivin J, Buntin L, Kalebic N, Harrison C. What makes people ready to conceive? Findings from the International Fertility Decision-Making Study. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018;6:90-101. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
29. Harper T, Kuohung W, Sayres L, Willis MD, Wise LA. Optimizing preconception care and interventions for improved population health. Fertil Steril. 2023;120(3 pt 1):438-48. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
30. Erfani A, Jahanbakhsh R, Kalantari A. Individualism and fertility intentions. Journal of Population Association of Iran. 2020;15(29):239-64. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
31. Wang S, Zhong S. Economic Uncertainty, Cultural and Ideational Transition, and Low Fertility. Sustainability. 2022;14(14):8344. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
