Volume 18, Issue 2 (7-2021)
J Res Dev Nurs Midw 2021, 18(2): 45-48 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Bahrami Babaheidari T, Amiri S, Mahmoodi Z, Haj Firooz Abadi M, Rahimi S, Soleymani Sartangi H et al . Comparison of Teacher Evaluation Indices from the Perspective of Students and Teachers at Alborz University of Medical Sciences. J Res Dev Nurs Midw 2021; 18 (2) :45-48
URL: http://nmj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1155-en.html
URL: http://nmj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1155-en.html
Touran Bahrami Babaheidari1 
, Siamak Amiri2 , Zohreh Mahmoodi3 , Marjan Haj Firooz Abadi2 , Sara Rahimi4 , Hadi Soleymani Sartangi5 , Arman Latifi 6
, Siamak Amiri2 , Zohreh Mahmoodi3 , Marjan Haj Firooz Abadi2 , Sara Rahimi4 , Hadi Soleymani Sartangi5 , Arman Latifi 6
1- Department of social medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
2- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
3- Social determinants of health research center, Alborz University of medical sciences, Karaj, Iran
4- Department of Medical Entomology. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5- Education and Training Office of Holeylan, Education and Training Administration of Ilam, Iran
6- Department of Public Health, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran ,latifiarman@gmail.com
2- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
3- Social determinants of health research center, Alborz University of medical sciences, Karaj, Iran
4- Department of Medical Entomology. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5- Education and Training Office of Holeylan, Education and Training Administration of Ilam, Iran
6- Department of Public Health, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran ,
Abstract: (2359 Views)
Background: Teacher evaluation is an essential and useful tool for decision making and determining appropriate teaching policies, especially in universities. The present study aimed to compare the teacher evaluation indices from the perspective of students and teachers at Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
Methods: The present descriptive-analytical study was conducted in 2013 on 34 faculty members and 418 students at Alborz University of Medical Sciences in Karaj, Iran. Data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire on demographic characteristics, target group, appropriate time for teacher evaluation and opinions of faculty members and students about the twenty indices of teacher evaluation. The data were analyzed with SPSS 16 using descriptive statistics, mean test and Pearson correlation coefficient.
Results: The most effective target groups for teacher evaluation from the perspective of teachers were elite students (58.9%) and normal students (20.6%), while the most effective target groups for teacher evaluation from the perspective of students were normal students (42.1%) and teachers (14.1%).
Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, we suggest using the criteria agreed by the teacher and students, revising the teacher evaluation forms, not limiting the evaluation process to the students' opinion, conducting self-evaluation by the teachers, conducting continuous evaluation at different times of the semester, a survey of teachers in preparing forms and summarizing and concluding the evaluations.
Methods: The present descriptive-analytical study was conducted in 2013 on 34 faculty members and 418 students at Alborz University of Medical Sciences in Karaj, Iran. Data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire on demographic characteristics, target group, appropriate time for teacher evaluation and opinions of faculty members and students about the twenty indices of teacher evaluation. The data were analyzed with SPSS 16 using descriptive statistics, mean test and Pearson correlation coefficient.
Results: The most effective target groups for teacher evaluation from the perspective of teachers were elite students (58.9%) and normal students (20.6%), while the most effective target groups for teacher evaluation from the perspective of students were normal students (42.1%) and teachers (14.1%).
Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, we suggest using the criteria agreed by the teacher and students, revising the teacher evaluation forms, not limiting the evaluation process to the students' opinion, conducting self-evaluation by the teachers, conducting continuous evaluation at different times of the semester, a survey of teachers in preparing forms and summarizing and concluding the evaluations.
perspective: Original Article |
References
1. Saif AA. Assessment and evaluating of education. 5ed. Doran Publications; 2010. [Persian]
2. Blanch-Hartigan D. Medical students' self-assessment of performance: results from three meta- analyses. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 84:3-9. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Saif AA. Educational Measurement, Assessment and Evaluation. 4th Ed, Tehran: Dowran Company; 2009. [Persian]
4. Gillespie M. Student teacher connection: A place of possibility. J Adv Nurse 2005; 52(4): 211-19. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
5. Marrison J. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Evaluation. BMJ. 2003; 326(7385): 385-387. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
6. Bastani P, Amini M, Taher Nejad K, Shaarbafchi Zadeh N. Faculty members' viewpoints about the present and the ideal teacher evaluation system in Tehran University of Medical Sciences. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2013; 1 (4), 140-7. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
7. Report of the task force on student evaluation of teaching: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; April 1999 [cited 2005], Available from: https://provost.unc.edu/policies-committees/task-force-online-learning/
8. Dargahi H, Mohammadzadeh N. Faculty Members' Evaluation by Students: Valid or Invalid. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2013; 13 (1):39-48. [Persian] [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
9. Adhami A. Academic assessment by students. Baztab. 2005;2(3):4. [Persian]
10. Trout P. flunking the test: The dismal record of student evaluations. Academe. 2000; 86(4):58-61 [View at paplisher] [DOI]
11. Ory JC. Faculty thoughts and concerns about student ratings. New directions for teaching and learning. 2001; 2001(87):3-15. [View at paplisher] [DOI:10.1002/tl.23] [Google Scholar]
12. Shakournia A, Motlagh MA, Malayeri A, Jahan mardi A, and Kamili Sani H. The view of Jondishapour Medical university students about faculty evaluation. Iranian J Edu Res 2005; 5: 109- 117. [Persian] [Google Scholar]
13. Sanagoo A, Jooybari L. Students' Viewpoints and Experiences about Evaluation of Academic staff in Theoretical courses. Stri in Devel of Med Edu. 2010; 7(1):57-69. [Persian] [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
14. Kaykhaei A, Sargazi Gh.H, Navidian A, Tabasi MA. Study of ZUMS faculty members' views on faculty members' assessment. Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2002; 4(3):135-40. [Persian] [Google Scholar]
15. Ashraf H, Sabri M, Haghpanah S. Determination of the most important factors in overall effectiveness of a clinical teacher: students' point of view. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2002; 2:14-14 [Persian] [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
16. Hajiaghajani S. Viewpoints of Shahid beheshti university faculty members Hajiaghajani S. Viewpoints of Shahid beheshti university faculty members about the effect of their evaluation by students on teaching activities. Res. J. Med. Sci. 2001; 1:8. [Persian]
17. Amini, M, Najafipour S, Torkan N, Ebrahimi Nejad F. Correlation between Educational Performance and Communication Skills of Jahrom Medical Teachers. JBUMS. 2010; 12 (5):100-105. [Persian] [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
18. Hossini M, Sarchami R. Attitude of students of Qazvin Medical University towards priorities in teachers assessment. Journal of Inflammatory Diseases. 2002; 6 (2):33-37. [Persian] [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
19. Raoufi SH, Seikhian A, Ebrahimzade F, Tarahi MJ, Ahmadi P. Designing a novel sheet to evaluate theoretical teaching quality of faculty members based on viewpoints of stakeholders and charles E. Glassickś scholarship principles. Hormozgan Medical Journal. 2010; 14(3):167-76. [Persian] [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
20. Moezi M, Shirzad H, Zamazad B, Rohi H. Evaluation process in viewpoints of academic staff and students in Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci. 2010; 11 (4) :63-75. [Persian] [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
21. Gillespie M. Student-teacher connection: a place of possibility. J Adv Nurs. 2005 Oct; 52(2):211-9. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
22. Sharifi M, Jourabchi Z, Alipour Haydari M. Teachers effectiveness on student assessment of teachers and the course. Journal of Inflammatory Diseases. 2002; 6 (2):81-87 [Persian] [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
23. Mobaraki A, Koldvi A. The Specialities of a Good Master from the Viewpoint of Students of Yasouj University of Medical Sciences 2007. Dena. 2007; 2(2) 55-60. [In Persian]
24. Hossini M, Sarchami R. Attitude of students of Qazvin Medical University towards priorities in teacher's assessment. J Qazvin Univ Med Sci. 2002; 6(2):33-7. [Persian] [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
25. Yaghobian M, Yaghobi T, Salmeh F, Golmohammadi F, Safari H, Savasari R, et al. Comparing the Effect of Teaching Using Educational Booklets and Lecture along with Educational Booklets on Nurses' Knowledge about Professional Laws and Regulations. Iranian J Med Edu. 2010; 9(4):372-80. [Persian] [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
26. Ghorbani R, Haji-Aghajani S, Heidarifar M, Andade F,Shams-Abadi M. Viewpoints of nursing and para-medical students about the features of a good university lecturer. Koomes 2008; 10: 77-83. [Persian] [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
27. Ghadami A, Salehi B, Sajadi S, Naji H. [Students' Points of View Regarding Effective Factors in Establishing Communication between Students and Faculty Members]. Iranian J Med Edu. 2007; 7(1):149-54. [Persian] [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
