Volume 17, Issue 2 (4-2020)                   J Res Dev Nurs Midw 2020, 17(2): 24-27 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Baniaghil A, Ghasemi S, Rezaei Aval M, Behnampour N. Effect of Communication Skill Training Based on Calgary-Cambridge Observation Model on Midwifery Students' Communication Skills. J Res Dev Nurs Midw 2020; 17 (2) :24-27
URL: http://nmj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1152-en.html
1- Counseling and Reproductive Health Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
2- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran , shohreh.ghasemi@goums.ac.ir
3- Master of Clinical Psychology, Judicatory, Gorgan, Iran
4- Biostatistics & Epidemiology Department, Faculty of Health, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 506 kb]   (2003 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (5972 Views)
Full-Text:   (2403 Views)

Introduction

  From the patients' point of view, communication skill is a top priority of the health care providers’ characteristics (1) and an important component of the midwifery care (2). Women are sensitive to their relationship with midwives. Good communication of midwives, especially at the time of admission, reduces the demand for additional care and, consequently, welfare costs (3). A good communication skill is essential for midwives for patient's evaluation and treatment (4).
Individual or interpersonal communication skills are a set of potential and actual abilities of the individual that can help to achieve acceptable and aware behaviors to reach a level of good emotional relationship. This skill makes it easier for one to interact with others in the community (5).
There are two types of communication skills. General communication skills or social communication skills (6) and communication skills related to the medical science field that health care staff, including midwives, need to understand patients' needs in addition to general communication skills. This skill is also referred to as effective communication, midwife-patient or physician-patient relationship (2).
As a key member of the health care team, a midwife should communicate effectively with patients, families, colleagues, and other staff in order to achieve their goals in providing accurate information, health education, counseling, and quality care services (2).
All human efforts and developments are aimed at promoting the health of human beings, in which the two most vulnerable groups of the community, including mothers and infants, need more attention (7). In pregnancy, delivery, and uncomplicated postpartum, care and support of these two vulnerable groups is the responsibility of the midwife (8, 9).
The results of some studies show that the medical team has moderate and in some cases poor communication skills (2, 10-12). Ahmadi et al. (2011) showed that midwifery students, Obstetrics and Gynecology interns and assistants are at the moderate level of communication (11). Tagizadeh et al. (2007) showed that the majority of midwives do not have good communication skills (13). In a study, Kaya et al. (2013) found that Istanbul Nursing and Midwifery College students 'communication skills were average (14) and Katebi et al. (2016) indicated that midwives' communication skills were also moderate according to pregnant women’s view (12).
There are currently six theoretical models of medical team-patient relationship-based communication skill training model, including The Bayer Institute for Healthcare Communication E4 Model, Three-function Model/Brown Interview Checklist, Calgary-Cambridge Observation Model, Patient-centered Clinical Method, Segue framework for teaching and assessing communication skills (SEGUE) and Four-habits Model (15).
There is a great deal of emphasis today on models based on mutuality based models, including Calgary-Cambridge Observation Model. Calgary-Cambridge Guide-Based communication skills training has integrated the mutuality model best by providing health services (16). In this model, the physician and the patient play a participatory and active role in the biography process. This provides a collaborative structure for decision making and determining a treatment plan. Since this model uses both patient and physician views and information, both are satisfied and patient compliance increase with the treatment plan (16).
Calgary-Cambridge Observation Model was designed in 1996 by Kurtz from the University of Calgary, Canada, and Silverman from the University of Cambridge, UK, as a framework for planning communication skills training (17). This model combined the proper traditional clinical practice with effective communication skills (18).
"Communication Skill Training" is a well-known and reliable method in medical sciences. This course is designed to ensure better interaction with patients. Some studies have shown that communication skills of medical staff improve after attending a communication skills training course (22-29). Communication skill training leads to more effective medical training. The physicians using clinical skills to provide trust and relationship; in a shorter period of time, treat patients and help them return to social activity faster. Communication skill training, in addition to treating patients, will also improve the community health (23).
Khodadadi et al. (2013) in their study showed that nurses' communication skills improved after communication skill training (24). Zamani et al. (2004) showed that patients' satisfaction with physicians' communication skills that were trained by Calgary-Cambridge Observation Model was more than patients' satisfaction with physicians who did not receive such training (25).
Regarding the importance of communication skills in the midwifery profession, the researchers conducted a study to determine the effect of general communication skill training based on special Calgary-Cambridge Observation Model on midwifery students' general communication skills.

   Methods

This study randomized controlled field trial with pre-test and post-test design was done on 30 undergraduate midwifery students of Golestan University of Medical Sciences in 2018.
Sample size in this study based on the study results of Bani Davoody et al.
 (26) (2012) with a baseline score of 21.56 and a standard deviation of 11.31 in interview skills at 0.95 confidence level, 0.80 test power, and assumption of an increase of 50% (11 points) in the mean score of interviewing skill and a 20% reduction in the standard deviation of the test group; is 14 patients estimated in each group.
Thirty students were selected at the first stage by convenience method and the ability of interviewing all students was evaluated using Evans checklist. The subjects were then randomly assigned into two experimental (n=15) and control (n=15) groups based on pre-test score and semester (Figur 1). The study inclusion criteria included undergraduate midwifery students of semester 6 and 8 who were studying at Golestan University of Medical Sciences until the end of the study and the study exclusion criteria were unwillingness to attend classes and failure to attend on time to evaluate primary communication skills.
For data collection, after providing necessary explanations and purposes of the study, the participants were assured that the information contained in the questionnaires was kept strictly confidential. Each subject will have full authority to continue or withdraw from research. After obtaining informed consent from midwifery students in written form, demographic information form and Queen Trail (Dom) Communication Skills Questionnaire were completed by students in the control and experimental groups as self-report.
Given that there was a possibility of passing the given instruction by the students of the experimental group to the control group, the control group was evaluated first. Six weeks after the pre-test, Queen Trail Communication Skills Questionnaire was completed by the control group students.
Group training sessions were carried out in two groups of 7 and 8 students. Based on Calgary-Cambridge Observation Model (Table 1) (28) in four sessions twice a week in lecture, role play, group discussion, brainstorming and film screening completed by the researcher (29, 30) 4 weeks after the intervention, Queendom General Communication Skills Questionnaire was completed by the experimental group (30).
 
 
 
 

Table 1. Communication skills training content based on Calgary-Cambridge communication skills model
 

Session

Goals

1

Referrals, Statement of Rules, Basic Training of Communication Skills based on Model, Communication Skills Importance, Physician-Patient relationship, Communication Models

2

Effective communication training, interviewing, data collection and structuring

3

Train empathy, establish relationships, explain to the patient, and end the interview

4

Team work activity, training videos, commentary and discussion on model components

 


 


Data were gathered using demographic information form and Queendom Persian version of Communication Skills Questionnaire. This questionnaire was developed by Queendom (2004) to assess general communication skills in adults. The questionnaire contains 34 items and 5 subscales; message perception (9 items), emotion management (8 items), listening (7 items), insight (5 items) and assertiveness (5 items).
This questionnaire is scored on five-Likert scale from always (score 5) to never (score 1). The items 2, 4, 6, 9, 10, 12, 13, 17, 19, 24, 25, 28, 32 and 33 were scored reversely. The scores ranging from 34 to 170 (6) and higher scores indicate more desired communication skills (6). The validity and reliability of Persian version of Queendom questionnaire were confirmed in a previous study (6). The reliability of the questionnaire was reported 0.71 for students using Cronbach's alpha (31).
The data were analyzed in SPSS statistics for windows, version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, III., USA). Shapiro-Wilk test was used for assessing normality of data, independent t-test and paired t-test were used for analysis of normal distribution and Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon test was used at 95% confidence level for non-normal distribution data.
Results
The mean age of students was ± No significant difference was found in demographic characteristics between the two groups (Table 2).

 

Table 2. Communication skills training content based on Calgary-Cambridge communication skills model
 
Group Experimental Control Total P value
N % N % N %
Marital status Single 57.8 8 78.6 11 67.9 19 0.225
Married 42.9 6 21.4 3 32.1 9
Residence place City 71.4 10 71.4 10 71.4 20 1.00
Village 28.6 4 28.6 4 28.6 8
 
 
Family income (million Rls.)
< 2 8 28.6 4 28.6 4 28.6  
 
0.736
2-4 16 57.1 8 57.1 8 57.1
4-6 1 3.6 1 7.1 0 0
6-8 2 7.1 1 7.1 1 7.1
8< 3.6 3.6 0 0 1 7.1
Attend communication skills course 64.4 13 13 35.7 8 Yes 5 0.256
53.6 15 15 64.3 6 No 9
 


 
 
 
 
Table 3. Comparison of the communication skills score before and after the intervention in the two groups
 
Variable Group Before After P value*
M±SD M±SD
Message perception Control 34.07± 2.97 33.36 ± 3.34 0.315
Experimental 33.71 ± 3.22 33.79 ± 2.51 0.856
Emotion management Control 28.50 ± 3.43 28.29 ± 2.86 0.671
Experimental 28.43 ± 2.65 28.43 ± 2.62 0.850
Listening Control 24.57 ± 2.34 25.07 ± 1.73 0.303
Experimental 25.79 ± 2.80 25.00 ± 2.57 0.336
Insight Control 17.36 ± 2.30 16.21 ± 1.92 0.112
Experimental 16.93 ± 2.01 16.36 ± 2.43 0.397
Assertiveness Control 17.79 ± 1.12 17.07 ± 2.09 0.246
Experimental 17.57 ± 2.24 18.43 ± 1.69 0.089
Total communication skills Control 122.29 ± 7.81 120.00 ± 8.08 0.207
Experimental 122.43 ± 9.40 122.00 ± 8.06 0.720
* Paired t-test or Wilcoxon test
 

According to the study results, the mean score of communication skills before the intervention in the control group was 122.29±7.81 and 122.43±9.40 in the experimental group, and no statistically significant relationship was found between the two groups in the mean of communication skills and five subscales (Table 3).
The mean score of communication skills one month after communication skill training was 120.00±8.08 in the control group and 122.00±8.06 in the experimental group. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in the mean of communication skills and five subscales (Table 3).
 
Table 4. Comparison of mean communication skill score based on five subscales between the groups before and after the intervention
Variable Group Before After P value*
M±SD M±SD Before After
Message perception Control 34.07± 2.97 33.36 ± 3.34 0.76 0.70
Experimental 33.71 ± 3.22 33.79 ± 2.51
Emotion management Control 28.50 ± 3.43 28.29 ± 2.86 0.95 0.89
Experimental 28.43 ± 2.65 28.43 ± 2.62
Listening Control 24.57 ± 2.34 25.07 ± 1.73 0.22 0.93
Experimental 25.79 ± 2.80 25.00 ± 2.57
Insight Control 17.36 ± 2.30 16.21 ± 1.92 0.60 0.86
Experimental 16.93 ± 2.01 16.36 ± 2.43
Assertiveness Control 17.79 ± 1.12 17.07 ± 2.09 0.60 0.07
Experimental 17.57 ± 2.24 18.43 ± 1.69
Total communication skills Control 122.29 ± 7.81 120.00 ± 8.08 0.98 0.51
Experimental 122.43 ± 9.40 122.00 ± 8.06
* Independent t-test or Mann-Whitney test
 
According to the study results, in the control group the mean score of communication skills before communication skill training was 122.29±7.81 and 120.8±0.08 after communication skill training and no statistically significant difference was found between the mean scores of communication skills and five subscales before and after communication skill training. In the experimental group, communication skill total score before communication skill training was 122.43±9.4 and 122±8.06 after communication skill training and statistically significant difference was found between the mean of communication skills and five subscales before and after communication skill training (Table 4).



 
 
 

Table 3. Comparison of the communication skills score before and after the intervention in the two groups
 

Variable

Group

Before

After

P value*

M±SD

M±SD

Message perception

Control

34.07± 2.97

33.36 ± 3.34

0.315

Experimental

33.71 ± 3.22

33.79 ± 2.51

0.856

Emotion management

Control

28.50 ± 3.43

28.29 ± 2.86

0.671

Experimental

28.43 ± 2.65

28.43 ± 2.62

0.850

Listening

Control

24.57 ± 2.34

25.07 ± 1.73

0.303

Experimental

25.79 ± 2.80

25.00 ± 2.57

0.336

Insight

Control

17.36 ± 2.30

16.21 ± 1.92

0.112

Experimental

16.93 ± 2.01

16.36 ± 2.43

0.397

Assertiveness

Control

17.79 ± 1.12

17.07 ± 2.09

0.246

Experimental

17.57 ± 2.24

18.43 ± 1.69

0.089

Total communication skills

Control

122.29 ± 7.81

120.00 ± 8.08

0.207

Experimental

122.43 ± 9.40

122.00 ± 8.06

0.720

* Paired t-test or Wilcoxon test
 

According to the study results, the mean score of communication skills before the intervention in the control group was 122.29±7.81 and 122.43±9.40 in the experimental group, and no statistically significant relationship was found between the two groups in the mean of communication skills and five subscales (Table 3).
The mean score of communication skills one month after communication skill training was 120.00±8.08 in the control group and 122.00±8.06 in the experimental group. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in the mean of communication skills and five subscales (Table 3).

According to the study results, in the control group the mean score of communication skills before communication skill training was 122.29±7.81 and 120.8±0.08 after communication skill training and no statistically significant difference was found between the mean scores of communication skills and five subscales before and after communication skill training. In the experimental group, communication skill total score before communication skill training was 122.43±9.4 and 122±8.06 after communication skill training and statistically significant difference was found between the mean of communication skills and five subscales before and after communication skill training (Table 4).

Table 4. Comparison of mean communication skill score based on five subscales between the groups before and after the intervention

Variable

Group

Before

After

P value*

M±SD

M±SD

Before

After

Message perception

Control

34.07± 2.97

33.36 ± 3.34

0.76

0.70

Experimental

33.71 ± 3.22

33.79 ± 2.51

Emotion management

Control

28.50 ± 3.43

28.29 ± 2.86

0.95

0.89

Experimental

28.43 ± 2.65

28.43 ± 2.62

Listening

Control

24.57 ± 2.34

25.07 ± 1.73

0.22

0.93

Experimental

25.79 ± 2.80

25.00 ± 2.57

Insight

Control

17.36 ± 2.30

16.21 ± 1.92

0.60

0.86

Experimental

16.93 ± 2.01

16.36 ± 2.43

Assertiveness

Control

17.79 ± 1.12

17.07 ± 2.09

0.60

0.07

Experimental

17.57 ± 2.24

18.43 ± 1.69

Total communication skills

Control

122.29 ± 7.81

120.00 ± 8.08

0.98

0.51

Experimental

122.43 ± 9.40

122.00 ± 8.06

* Independent t-test or Mann-Whitney test
  

   Discussion
This study was conducted to determine the effect of communication skills training based on Calgary-Cambridge model on general communication skills of midwifery students at Gorgan University of Medical Sciences. The study results showed that communication skills training based on Calgary-Cambridge model had no significant effect on the mean score of general communication skills and its subscales (message perception, emotion management, listening, insight, and assertiveness) after the intervention.
The above results were not consistent with the study results of Zamani et al. (2004) (25). The study results showed that communication skill training based on Calgary-Cambridge Observation Model improved patient satisfaction with the communication skills of trained physicians. The present study examined physicians' communication skills through their patients' satisfaction and view. While in the present study, midwifery students' communication skills were examined from their own point of view as self-report. The study also examined physicians' communication skills when communicating with patients and in patient registration sessions, but the present study examined students' communication skills in all aspects, not just patients.
The results of the present study were not consistent with the study results of Rezaie et al. (2003) (32). The researchers showed that teaching communication skills to nurses had a positive effect on improving their communication skills in the experimental group after the intervention. The difference between the results of this study and the present study may be related to communication skill training to nurses. In this study, communication skill training to nurses was for 7 hours a day, but in the present study, special communication skills training was based on Calgary-Cambridge Observation Model to midwifery students, with a greater focus on the patient interview and registration skills.
Also, the results of present study was not consistent with Khodadadi et al. (2012) study (24). Khodadadi et al. (2012) showed that communication skill training is effective on improving nurses' communication skills. In this study, as in a study by Rezaie et al. (2003), communication skills were taught to nurses working in Tabriz hospitals for two months.
Special Communication Skill Training based on Calgary-Cambridge Observation Model is a specialized method aimed to enhance the medical-related specialized skills of midwifery students and can be used to improve the specialized skills. Baniaghil et al. (2018) showed that Special Communication Skill Training based on Calgary-Cambridge Observation Model was effective on midwifery students' medical-related specialized interviewing skills (33).
The limitations of the present study were the lack of teamwork in the first to third educational sessions and home exercises.
Conclusion
According to the finding, communication skills training based on Calgary-Cambridge Observation Model had no significant effect on communication skills and its five subscales. Therefore, to improve communication skills, this model is not sufficient and may need to be modified, or it is necessary to add more intervention in order to enhance the communication skills.
Acknowledgments
This paper is part of the Master's Thesis on Midwifery Counseling with the permission and Support of Research and Information Technology Department and Ethics Committee of Golestan University of Medical Sciences (Code of Ethics IR.GOUMS.REC.1396.315) and Registration at the Clinical Trial Registration Center (IRCT20180516039692N1).
We appreciate all those who assisted for conducting this study, especially Research and Technology Department of Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Bouyeh School of Nursing and Midwifery, all the students who participated in the study, and Ms. Fatemeh Bayat, Master of Science in Midwifery Counseling.

perspective: Original Article | Subject: Midwifery

References
1. Sari MI, Prabandari YS, Claramita M. Physicians' professionalism at primary care facilities from patients' perspective: The importance of doctors' communication skills. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2016;5(1):56-60. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
2. Khadivzadeh T, Katebi MS, Sepehri Shamloo Z, Esmaily H. Assessment of Midwives' Communication Skills at the Maternity Wards of Teaching Hospitals in Mashhad in 2014. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health. 2015;3(3):394-400. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
3. Andrissi L, Petraglia F, Giuliani A, Severi FM, Angioni S, Valensise H, et al. The influence of doctor-patient and midwife-patient relationship in quality care perception of Italian pregnant women: an exploratory study. Plos One. 2015;10(4):e0124353. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
4. Novak, brek. Berek & Novak's gynecology: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. [View at paplisher]
5. Maguire P, Pitceathly C. Key communication skills and how to acquire them. British Medical Journal. 2002;325(7366):697. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
6. Hosseinchari M, Fadakar M. Investigating the effects of higher education on communication skills based on comparison of college and high school students. 2006;12(15):21-32. [Persian]. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
7. Simbar M, Alizadeh Dibazari Z, Abed Saeidi J, Alavi Majd H. Assessment of quality of care in postpartum wards of Shaheed Beheshti Medical Science University hospitals, 2004. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 2005;18(5):333-42. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
8. Diane F, Cooper M. Myles textbook for midwives. NewYork: Churchill Livingstone; 2003. [View at paplisher]
9. Brook C. The New Midwifery: Science and Sensitivity in Practice. Journal of the Motherhood Initiative for Research and Community Involvement. 2003;5(2). [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
10. Taghizadeh Z, Rezaiepour A, Mehran A, Alimoradi Z. Usage of communication skills by midwives and its relation to clients' satisfaction. Hayat. 2007;12(4):47-55. [Persian] [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
11. Ahmadi M, Azimi N, Kiani M, Alavi Majd H. Investigating the relationship between medical students and patients in the labor ward of selected hospitals in Tehran. Medical Ethics Journal. 2012;5(17):77-88.[Persian] [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
12. Katebi MS, Khadivzadeh T, Sepehri Shamloo Z, Esmaily H. Evaluating Midwives Communication Skills from the Perspective of Parturient Women Attending to Hospitals for Delivery. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health. 2017;5(2):882-9. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
13. Salimi M, Peyman H, Sadeghifar J, Toloui Rakhshan S, Alizadeh M, Yamani N. Assessment of Interpersonal Communication Skills and Associated Factors among Students of Allied Medicine School in Tehran University of Medical Sciences.Iranian Journal of Medical Education.2013;12(12):895-902.[Persian] [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
14. Özdemir G, Kaya H. Midwifery and nursing students' communication skills and life orientation: Correlation with stress coping approaches. Nursing And Midwifery Studies. 2013;2(2):198. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
15. Brown R, Bylund CL. Theoretical models of communication skills training. Handbook of Communication in Oncology and Palliative Care. 2011:27-40. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
16. Managheb E. Effective Communication with Patients: for Medical Students and Doctors. Shiraz: Irsa. 2010. 136 p. [persian]
17. Kurtz SM, Silverman JD. The Calgary-Cambridge Referenced Observation Guides: an aid to defining the curriculum and organizing the teaching in communication training programmes. Med Educ. 1996;30(2):83-9. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
18. Kurtz S, Silverman J, Benson J, Draper J. Marrying content and process in clinical method teaching: enhancing the Calgary-Cambridge guides. Academic Medicine. 2003;78(8):802-9. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
19. Jensen BF, Gulbrandsen P, Dahl FA, Krupat E, Frankel RM, Finset A. Effectiveness of a short course in clinical communication skills for hospital doctors: results of a crossover randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(2):163-9. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
20. Berkhof M, van Rijssen HJ, Schellart AJ, Anema JR, van der Beek AJ. Effective training strategies for teaching communication skills to physicians: an overview of systematic reviews. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(2):152-62. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
21. Stein T, Frankel RM, Krupat E. Enhancing clinician communication skills in a large healthcare organization: a longitudinal case study. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;58(1):4-12. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
22. Maguire P, Booth K, Elliott C, Jones B. Helping health professionals involved in cancer care acquire key interviewing skills-the impact of workshops. Eur J Cancer. 1996;32(9):1486-9. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
23. Shakerinia I. Physician-patient relationship and patient's satisfaction. Iranian Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine. 2009;2(3):9-16. [Persian]. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
24. Khodadadi E, Ebrahimi H, Moghaddasian S, Babapour J. The effect of communication skills training on quality of care, self-efficacy, job satisfaction and communication skills rate of nurses in hospitals of tabriz, iran. JCS. 2013;2(1):27-37. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
25. Zamani A, Shams B, Moazzam E. Communication Skills Training for Physicians as a Strategy for Enhancing Patients' Satisfaction: A Model for Continuing Education. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2004;4(1):15-22. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
26. Banidavoodi S, Hoseinzade M, Maraghi E. Assessment of physicians' communication with patients in Ahvaz Hospitals from Patient and observer 'Perspectives. Educ Develop Jundishapur. 2013;4(4):65-71.[persian] [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
27. Ferris HA. The Use of Small Group Tutorials as an Educational Strategy in Medical Education. IJHE. 2015;4(2):225. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
28. Silverman J, Kurtz S, Draper J. Skills for communicating with patients: CRC Press; 2016. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
29. Choudhary A, Gupta V. Teaching communications skills to medical students: Introducing the fine art of medical practice. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2015;5(Suppl 1):S41. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
30. Baezat F, Rahimi S. The effectiveness of communication skills training on medical students' self-efficiency and social well-being based on the Calgary- Cambridge model. Bi-quarterly Journal of Educational Studies NAMA . 2015:12-9. [Persian] [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
31. Yousefi F. The relationship between emotional Intelligence and communication Skills in university students. Journal of Iranian Psychologists. 2006;3(9):21-6.[Persian]. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
32. Rhezaii S, Hossaini AM, Falahi M. Evaluating Impact Of Communication Skills Training On Level Of Job Stress Among Nursing Personnel Working At Rehabilitation Centers In Cities&58; Ray-Tehran-Shemiranat. Tehran University Medical Journal. 2006;64(1):21-6. [Persian]] [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
33. Baniaghil AS, Ghasemi S, Rezaei M, Behnampour N. Investigation of communication skills training effect based on Calgary- Cambridge model on interviewing skill in midwifery students of Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan,2018. Gorgan: Golestan University of Medical Sciences; 2018. [Persian] [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research Development in Nursing and Midwifery

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb