Volume 20, Issue 2 (10-2023)                   J Res Dev Nurs Midw 2023, 20(2): 63-66 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.GOUMS.REC.1400.364


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Jahanshahi R, Mirzaei F, Askari M H, Asgari N, Ghasemi S, Sanagoo A et al . The Persian version of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Adult Health-Related Quality of Life (NF1-AdQOL) Questionnaire in Iranians: A Validity and reliability study. J Res Dev Nurs Midw 2023; 20 (2) :63-66
URL: http://nmj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1540-en.html
1- Student Research Committee, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
2- Department of Augusta University, GA ,USA
3- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran , sanagoo@goums.ac.ir
4- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
Abstract:   (1343 Views)
Background: Because of the numerous problems created by neurofibromatosis type 1, particular quality-of-life evaluation measures are quite significant. In Iran, general instruments are used to assess the quality of life of the target group. This study aimed to translate and examine the psychometrics of the Persian version of the Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Adult Health-related Quality of Life (NF1-AdQOL) questionnaire.
Methods: This was a methodological and cross-sectional study. A total of 414 adult patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 in the Iranian Association of Neurofibromatosis were selected via convenience sampling. With the permission of the questionnaire's developer, the English version was translated into Persian using the standard back-translation procedure. Validity was assessed using face validity, content validity, exploratory, and confirmatory factor analysis. The reliability and internal consistency of the questionnaire were assessed by Cronbach's alpha and Spearman's correlation, respectively.
Results: The participants' mean age was 34.48±8.3 years. The 31-item questionnaire was translated into Persian, and based on content validity analysis, 2 items were removed. The adequacy of the sample size was acceptable (KMO = 0.940). Exploratory factor analysis revealed 4 factors. The scale had good reliability (Cronbach's alpha: 0.95), and the intraclass coefficient was 0.91. The total mean quality of life score was 93±25.18.
Conclusions: The finding showed that the Persian version of the questionnaire has good structural characteristics and is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring the quality of life of patients with neurofibromatosis 1.
Full-Text [PDF 464 kb]   (631 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (324 Views)  
Type of study: Original Article | Subject: Psychology and Psychiatry

References
1. Saleh M, Dib A, Beaini S, Saad C, Faraj S, El Joueid Y, et al. Neurofibromatosis type 1 system-based manifestations and treatments: a review. Neurol Sci. 2023;44(6):1931-47. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
2. Goetsch Weisman A, Weiss McQuaid S, Radtke HB, Stoll J, Brown B, Gomes A. Neurofibromatosis‐and schwannomatosis‐associated tumors: Approaches to genetic testing and counseling considerations. Am J Med Genet A. 2023;191(10):2467-81. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Khatua S, Gutmann DH, Packer RJ. Neurofibromatosis type 1 and optic pathway glioma: molecular interplay and therapeutic insights. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018;65(3):e26838. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
4. Cannon A, Chen M-J, Li P, Boyd KP, Theos A, Redden DT, et al. Cutaneous neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis type I: a quantitative natural history study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018;13(1):31. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
5. Wang DL, Smith KB, Esparza S, Leigh FA, Muzikansky A, Park ER, et al. Emotional functioning of patients with neurofibromatosis tumor suppressor syndrome. Genet Med. 2012;14(12):977-82. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
6. Foji S, Mohammadi E, Sanagoo A, Jouybari L. The patients' experiences of burden of neurofibromatosis: A qualitative study. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2021;26(4):342-8. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
7. Sanagoo A, Jouybari L, Koohi F, Sayehmiri F. Evaluation of QoL in neurofibromatosis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. BMC Neurol. 2019;19(1):123. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
8. Leplège A, Ecosse E, Verdier A, Perneger TV. The French SF-36 Health Survey: translation, cultural adaptation and preliminary psychometric evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1013-23. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
9. Chren MM, Lasek RJ, Quinn LM, Mostow EN, Zyzanski SJ. Skindex, a quality-of-life measure for patients with skin disease: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Invest Dermatol. 1996;107(5):707-13. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
10. Crawford H, North K, Wilson M, Berman Y, McKelvey-Martin V, Morrison P, et al. Development and preliminary evaluation of the Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Adult Quality of Life (NF1‐AdQoL) questionnaire. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022;47(2):271-81. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
11. Legius E, Messiaen L, Wolkenstein P, Pancza P, Avery RA, Berman Y, et al. Revised diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type 1 and Legius syndrome: an international consensus recommendation. Genet Med. 2021;23(8):1506-13. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
12. Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: a clear and user‐friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):268-74. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
13. Hajizadeh E, Asghari M. Methods and statistical analysis with a view to research methods in biological and health sciences. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University; 2018. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
14. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28(4):563-75. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
15. Roebianto A, Savitri SI, Aulia I, Suciyana A, Mubarokah L. Content validity: Definition and procedure of content validation in psychological research. TPM. 2023;30(1):5-18. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
16. Kellar S, Kelvin E. Munro's statistical methods for health care research. 6th ed. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
17. Munro B. Statistical methods for health care research.15th ed. lippincott williams & wilkins; 2005. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
18. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34-42. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
19. Aaronson N, Alonso J, Burnam A, Lohr KN, Patrick DL, Perrin E, et al. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(3):193-205. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
20. Soghi I, Saeedi S, Sanagoo A, Jouybari L, Ebrahimirad M, Mehravar F. Quality Of Life in a Group of Iranian Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 with Cutaneous Expressions. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2018;28(162):95-103. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
21. Bicudo NP, de Menezes Neto BF, da Silva de Avó LR, Germano CMR, Melo DG. Quality of Life in Adults with Neurofibromatosis 1 in Brazil. J Genet Couns. 2016;25(5):1063-74. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
22. Hamoy-Jimenez G, Kim R, Suppiah S, Zadeh G, Bril V, Barnett C. Quality of life in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2 in Canada. Neurooncol Adv. 2020;2(Suppl1):i141-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
23. Doser K, Kenborg L, Andersen EW, Bidstrup PE, Kroyer A, Hove H, et al. Educational delay and attainment in persons with neurofibromatosis 1 in Denmark. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019;27(6):857-68. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
24. Financial Tribune. Unemployment at 9.2% in Q1. 2022. [View at Publisher]
25. Schmitt N. Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment. 1996;8(4):350-3. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research Development in Nursing and Midwifery

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb