1. Saleh M, Dib A, Beaini S, Saad C, Faraj S, El Joueid Y, et al. Neurofibromatosis type 1 system-based manifestations and treatments: a review. Neurol Sci. 2023;44(6):1931-47. [
View at Publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
2. Goetsch Weisman A, Weiss McQuaid S, Radtke HB, Stoll J, Brown B, Gomes A. Neurofibromatosis‐and schwannomatosis‐associated tumors: Approaches to genetic testing and counseling considerations. Am J Med Genet A. 2023;191(10):2467-81. [
View at Publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
3. Khatua S, Gutmann DH, Packer RJ. Neurofibromatosis type 1 and optic pathway glioma: molecular interplay and therapeutic insights. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018;65(3):e26838. [
View at Publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
4. Cannon A, Chen M-J, Li P, Boyd KP, Theos A, Redden DT, et al. Cutaneous neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis type I: a quantitative natural history study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018;13(1):31. [
View at Publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
5. Wang DL, Smith KB, Esparza S, Leigh FA, Muzikansky A, Park ER, et al. Emotional functioning of patients with neurofibromatosis tumor suppressor syndrome. Genet Med. 2012;14(12):977-82. [
View at Publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
6. Foji S, Mohammadi E, Sanagoo A, Jouybari L. The patients' experiences of burden of neurofibromatosis: A qualitative study. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2021;26(4):342-8. [
View at Publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
7. Sanagoo A, Jouybari L, Koohi F, Sayehmiri F. Evaluation of QoL in neurofibromatosis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. BMC Neurol. 2019;19(1):123. [
View at Publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
8. Leplège A, Ecosse E, Verdier A, Perneger TV. The French SF-36 Health Survey: translation, cultural adaptation and preliminary psychometric evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1013-23. [
View at Publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
9. Chren MM, Lasek RJ, Quinn LM, Mostow EN, Zyzanski SJ. Skindex, a quality-of-life measure for patients with skin disease: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Invest Dermatol. 1996;107(5):707-13. [
View at Publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
10. Crawford H, North K, Wilson M, Berman Y, McKelvey-Martin V, Morrison P, et al. Development and preliminary evaluation of the Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Adult Quality of Life (NF1‐AdQoL) questionnaire. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022;47(2):271-81. [
View at Publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
11. Legius E, Messiaen L, Wolkenstein P, Pancza P, Avery RA, Berman Y, et al. Revised diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type 1 and Legius syndrome: an international consensus recommendation. Genet Med. 2021;23(8):1506-13. [
View at Publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
12. Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: a clear and user‐friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):268-74. [
View at Publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
13. Hajizadeh E, Asghari M. Methods and statistical analysis with a view to research methods in biological and health sciences. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University; 2018. [
View at Publisher] [
Google Scholar]
14. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28(4):563-75. [
View at Publisher] [
DOI] [
Google Scholar]
15. Roebianto A, Savitri SI, Aulia I, Suciyana A, Mubarokah L. Content validity: Definition and procedure of content validation in psychological research. TPM. 2023;30(1):5-18. [
View at Publisher] [
Google Scholar]
16. Kellar S, Kelvin E. Munro's statistical methods for health care research. 6th ed. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. [
View at Publisher] [
Google Scholar]
17. Munro B. Statistical methods for health care research.15th ed. lippincott williams & wilkins; 2005. [
View at Publisher] [
Google Scholar]
18. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34-42. [
View at Publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
19. Aaronson N, Alonso J, Burnam A, Lohr KN, Patrick DL, Perrin E, et al. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(3):193-205. [
View at Publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
20. Soghi I, Saeedi S, Sanagoo A, Jouybari L, Ebrahimirad M, Mehravar F. Quality Of Life in a Group of Iranian Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 with Cutaneous Expressions. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2018;28(162):95-103. [
View at Publisher] [
Google Scholar]
21. Bicudo NP, de Menezes Neto BF, da Silva de Avó LR, Germano CMR, Melo DG. Quality of Life in Adults with Neurofibromatosis 1 in Brazil. J Genet Couns. 2016;25(5):1063-74. [
View at Publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
22. Hamoy-Jimenez G, Kim R, Suppiah S, Zadeh G, Bril V, Barnett C. Quality of life in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2 in Canada. Neurooncol Adv. 2020;2(Suppl1):i141-9. [
View at Publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
23. Doser K, Kenborg L, Andersen EW, Bidstrup PE, Kroyer A, Hove H, et al. Educational delay and attainment in persons with neurofibromatosis 1 in Denmark. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019;27(6):857-68. [
View at Publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
24. Financial Tribune. Unemployment at 9.2% in Q1. 2022. [
View at Publisher]
25. Schmitt N. Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment. 1996;8(4):350-3. [
View at Publisher] [
DOI] [
Google Scholar]