Back to the articles list | Back to browse issues page

‎ 10.29252/jgbfnm.22.X.X
Ethics code: IR.USWR.REC.1403.209.

XML Print

Secondary traumatic stress in emergency department nurses: A multi-methods study protocol
Mahdieh Motie1 , Masoud Fallahi-khoshknab1 , Farahnaz Mohammadi Shahbolaghi2 , Mohammad Saeed Khanjani3 , Marcus Stueck4 , Hamidreza Khankeh5
1- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Behavioral Sciences, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Iranian Research Center on Aging, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Counseling, Faculty of Behavioral Sciences, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- International Biocentric Research Academy (IBRA), Leipzig, Germany
5- Health in Emergency and Disaster Research Center, Social Health Research Institute, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran ; QUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité, Berlin, Germany , hrkhankeh@gmail.com
Abstract:   (152 Views)

Background: Secondary traumatic stress (STS) is a psychological phenomenon that refers to the negative and traumatic emotional experiences that individuals endure as a result of exposure to the pain and suffering of others, particularly in caring professions such as emergency nursing. STS not only affects the mental health of nurses but can also have a significant impact on the healthcare system. We will conduct this study to explore the phenomenon of STS in depth and compile a policy brief.
Methods: This study employs a multi-methods approach, integrating a grounded theory study, a systematic scoping review, and the Delphi method, culminating in the development of a policy brief. Grounded theory, recommended by Corbin and Strauss (2014), will be used to explore the process of STS among emergency nurses through individual interviews and observations. Participants will be selected using purposive and theoretical sampling until data saturation is achieved. Data collection will focus on emergency nurses' experiences and emotional responses, with analysis proceeding through five stages: open coding, concept development, contextual analysis, process analysis, and category integration. The second phase is a systematic scoping review exploring challenges in managing STS among emergency nurses. This review will synthesize national and international experiences, based on Arksey and O’Malley’s five-step framework and the PRISMA model to systematically collect and integrate findings. The results from the grounded theory, including identified concepts, facilitators, and barriers, will be integrated with the scoping review findings using the classical Delphi method. A panel of expert nurses and scholars will engage in iterative Delphi sessions to refine perspectives on STS in emergency nursing. Finally, a policy brief will be developed, synthesizing key findings and providing evidence-based recommendations for policymakers.
Conclusion: This study protocol offers a comprehensive guide for conducting a multi-methods study, outlining the research process step-by-step to aid researchers using similar methodologies. It addresses common language-related challenges, suggests solutions, and helps deeply explore the phenomenon of STS and compile a policy brief. The protocol emphasizes maintaining high research integrity through specific criteria and provides a detailed discussion of ethical considerations and research methodology. The authors advocate for publishing multi-methods protocols before implementation to improve research integrity, foster ethical and integrated practices, and support novice researchers.

Keywords: Compassion Fatigue, Secondary Traumatic Stress, Secondary Traumatization, Vicarious Trauma, Emergency Nursing
     
Type of study: Original Article | Subject: Nursing
References
1. Park H, Kim H, Kim H. A Scoping Review of Secondary Traumatic Stress in Nurses Working in the Emergency Department or Trauma Care Settings. J Adv Nurs. 2025. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
2. Xu Z, Zhao B, Zhang Z, Wang X, Jiang Y, Zhang M, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of secondary traumatic stress in emergency nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2321761. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Badr S, Nyce A, Awan T, Cortes D, Mowdawalla C, Rachoin J-S. Measures of emergency department crowding, a systematic review. how to make sense of a long list. Open Access Emerg Med. 2022;14:5-14. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
4. Barleycorn D. Awareness of secondary traumatic stress in emergency nursing. Emerg Nurse. 2019;27(5):19-22. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
5. Alshammari B, Alanazi NF, Kreedi F, Alshammari F, Alkubati SA, Alrasheeday A, et al. Exposure to secondary traumatic stress and its related factors among emergency nurses in Saudi Arabia: a mixed method study. BMC Nurs. 2024;23(1):337. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
6. Zhang H, Xia Z, Yu S, Shi H, Meng Y, Dator WL. Interventions for Compassion Fatigue, Burnout, and Secondary Traumatic Stress in Nurses: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis.Nurs Health Sci. 2025;27(1):e70042. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
7. Dixit P, Srivastava SP, Tiwari SK, Chauhan S, Bishnoi R. Compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress among nurses after the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Ind Psychiatry J. 2024;33(1):54-61. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
8. Bridger KM, Binder JF, Kellezi B. Secondary traumatic stress in foster carers: Risk factors and implications for intervention. J Child Fam Stud. 2020;29(2):482-92. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
9. Koştu N, İnci FH, Arslan S. Compassion fatigue and the meaning in life as predictors of secondary traumatic stress in nurses during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Int J Nurs Pract. 2024;30(4):e13249. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
10. Oakley KN, Copel LC, Ross JG. Secondary Traumatic Stress in Nursing Students: An Integrative Review. Nurse Educ. 2025;50(1):E47-52. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
11. Yao J, Zhou X, Xu D, Liu T, Gui Y, Huang Y. Current status and influencing factors of secondary traumatic stress in emergency and intensive care nurses: a cross-sectional analysis. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024;17:567-76. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
12. Gillespie GL, Meyer HA, Daugherty M, Puthoff D, Fryman LJ, Howard PK. Stress and Coping in Emergency Nurses Following Trauma Patient Care: A Qualitative Grounded Theory Approach. J Trauma Nurs. 2024;31(3):136-48. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
13. Alavi SM, Kia-Keating M, Nerenberg C. Secondary traumatic stress and burnout in health care providers: A post-disaster study. Traumatol. 2023;29(3):389-401. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
14. Rushforth A, Durk M, Rothwell-Blake GA, Kirkman A, Ng F, Kotera Y. Self-compassion interventions to target secondary traumatic stress in healthcare workers: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(12):6109. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
15. Koohsari E, Darban F, Safarzai E, Kordi M. Understanding the effect of post-traumatic stress on the professional quality of life of pre-hospital emergency staff. Emerg Nurse. 2021;29(4):33-40. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
16. Jimenez RR, Andersen S, Song H, Townsend C. Vicarious trauma in mental health care providers. J Interprof Educ Pract. 2021;24:100451. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
17. Hajiesmaello M, Hajian S, Riazi H, Majd HA, Yavarian R. Secondary traumatic stress in iranian midwives: stimuli factors, outcomes and risk management.BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22(1):56. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
18. Montero-Tejero DJ, Jiménez-Picón N, Gómez-Salgado J, Vidal-Tejero E, Fagundo-Rivera J. Factors influencing occupational stress perceived by emergency nurses during prehospital care: a systematic review. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024;17:501-28. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
19. Uddin H, Hasan M, Cuartas-Alvarez T, Castro-Delgado R. Effects of mass casualty incidents on anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder among doctors and nurses: a systematic review. Public Health. 2024;234:132-42. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
20. Jiaru J, Yanxue Z, Wennv H. Incidence of stress among emergency nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(4):e31963. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
21. Comparcini D, Simonetti V, Totaro M, Apicella A, Galli F, Toccaceli A, et al. Impact of Traumatic Stress on Nurses' Work Ability, Job Satisfaction, Turnover and Intention to Leave: A Cross‐Sectional Study. J Adv Nurs. 2025. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
22. Farmahini Farahani M, Jaberi K, Purfarzad Z. Workplace spirituality, compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress: a cross‐sectional study in Iranian nurses. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2023;2023(1):7685791. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
23. Lykins AB, Seroka NW, Mayor M, Seng S, Higgins JT, Okoli CTC. Compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress among nursing staff at an academic medical center: a cross-sectional analysis. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2024;30(1):63-73. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
24. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. New York:Sage publications;2014. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
25. Rieger KL. Discriminating among grounded theory approaches. Nurs Inq. 2019;26(1):e12261. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
26. Hamidreza K. Applied qualitative research in health science. Tehran:Jame'e Negar;2024. [View at Publisher]
27. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19-32. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
28. Linstone HA, Turoff M. The delphi method: Addison-Wesley Reading. MA;1975. [View at Publisher]
29. Fletcher AJ, Marchildon GP. Using the Delphi method for qualitative, participatory action research in health leadership. Int J Qual Methods. 2014;13(1):1-18. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
30. Devenish G, Pollard C, Kerr D. The Delphi process for Public Health Policy Development: five things you need to know. Western Australia:Curtin University;2012. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
31. Beynon P, Chapoy C, Gaarder M, Masset E. What difference does a policy brief make? Full report of an IDS, 3ie, Norad study. Institute of Development Studies and the International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie);2012. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
32. DeMarco R, Tufts KA. The mechanics of writing a policy brief. Nurs Outlook. 2014;62(3):219-24. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
33. Felt E, Carrasco JM, Vives-Cases C. [Methodology for the development of policy brief in public health]. Gac Sanit. 2018;32(4):390-2. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
34. Kopenski. Guidelines for Writing a Policy Brief. 2010. [View at Publisher]
35. Ndihokubwayo K. Know How to Write an Influential Policy Brief: A Systematic Guide to Writers and Readers. Journal of Classroom Practices. 2023;2(2):1-10. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
36. Likando GN, Kadhila N. The role of a policy brief in policy formulation and review: bringing evidence to bear. Journal for Studies in Humanities & Social Sciences. 2017;6(2):47. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.